Is it me or does Cindy McCain look like she's mocking her husband in this photo?
It's a toss up- what to title this post, "Senator Government," or, "Sarah Palin- Not my Role Model!"
Was McCain's misspeak tonight calling Senator Obama, "Senator Government" a Freudian slip or was it strategic? And how he could possibly think that just because Sarah Palin is female that she warrants the title of role model to women across America, let alone an expert on every family of a child with special needs?
51 million Americans (18% of the population in the US), 4 million of whom are children between 6-14, have disabilities. How does John McCain, in his assertion tonight that,
"she (Palin) understands that better than almost any American that I know," not know any families that include individuals with differing abilities. How Sarah Palin has automatically become qualified to be the spokesperson for "Special Needs Families" is beyond me. I own a VW Jetta. That does not automaticallymake me more qualified than almost any other American to drive them or repair them.
McCain should also know how to employ person first language. Obama's not off the hook here either. When speaking about a particular subset of the American population, they should not repeatedly say "special needs children," "disabled children," or ,"special needs families." These are individuals-
people, and families who are living with differences from what my be considered typical. The disability does not define the individual. Having been a special education teacher for eight years, I do understand and appreciate the road Palin has ahead as a mother of a child with Downs Syndrome. Though some people seem to overlook the fact that there many more joys than challenges when raising a child with cognitive challenges and other different abilities.
Obama does address a very important federal spending predicament proposed by the McCain platform in this statement
:
"I do want to just point out that autism, for example, or other special needs will require some additional funding, if we're going to get serious in terms of research. That is something that every family that advocates on behalf of disabled children talk about.
And if we have an across-the-board spending freeze, we're not going to be able to do it. That's an example of, I think, the kind of use of the scalpel that we want to make sure that we're funding some of those programs.
Funding special education and research requires, well, funding. How will the McCain/Palin administration handle expanding programs and research for autism and other disabilities if they are going to freeze spending? And what about those unfunded mandates? The federal government already isn't paying for the programs they mandate. I can tell you first hand how much that affects programs for students with special needs. It's not pretty.
And finally, WHO CARES if Sarah Palin's husband "is a pretty tough guy too?" Last I checked it was Sarah Palin, not her husband, that John McCain chose for his running mate. That comment was pointless and rather demeaning to Sarah Palin as a competent politician and leader.